More BLS news…BLS Wagon announced
March 12, 2007 - 11:00 am5 Responses to “More BLS news…BLS Wagon announced”
I’m not a big fan of Flint’s and can’t say that this article really changes my mind either.
If you take the long-term view, the BLS is going to allow Cadillac to rationalize their products to better match the competition.
They realize, I think, that the CTS is more of a 5-series competitor (or should be). I fully expect with the 2nd generation BLS, that we’ll see it take the new entry-level, 3-series/C-Class/A4, competitor position. This would allow the CTS to go hunting 5-series/E-class/A6 and the CTS-V to go after the M5’s of the world.
Then the STS can be moved up-market to be more of an 7-series/S-class/A8 type of car.
The only issue would be if the BLS could be a credible competitor to the 3-Series, etc. if it is based on Epsilon2 (meaning a front-drive chassis w/ all-wheel drive as an option – and likely standard on the BLS).
I’d rather see GM build the next BLS on the Zeta rear-drive chassis (which is lower cost than the CTS/STS Sigma platform) and therefore a better match to the competition.
This would also skirt the issue some have with the BLS being too close to a Saab 9-3 in mission (entry-luxury, front drive).
Your comments make many valid points—and I’m definitely not a fan of the author of that article, Flint—but his perspective stuck in my mind from this article several months ago. It seems incredulous that so much money would be spent to “badge engineer” an entry level luxury sedan, with such poor performance in the marketplace. Now, the addition of the “Estate” model made me wonder why GM would put more money into the current BLS, rather than cut their losses and move on towards developing a new, RWD or AWD, entry level platform? It won’t revive sales enough to justify the expense, and with General Motors tight on funds, the new entry-level Cadillac can use all the development dollars it can get! Even as a “stop-gap” measure, in my opinion, this reflects another poor business decision.
Do you think this new Caddy wagon will have an AWD version?
From what I understand, we won’t see AWD in the BLS until it is redesigned (assuming the next BLS is built on the new Epsilon 2 chassis)...the current chassis doesn’t support AWD.
A new Saab 9-3 has already been spied in testing that has the AWD system. I wouldn’t expect the new BLS until a year or two after this model goes into production.
Care to comment?

This car does not look too bad, but it lost alot by not having the C-pillar detail of the Sedan. The roof rails look nice on this particular model. However, I previously posted the following link, and it contains a thoughtful article (although not by one of my favorite automotive critics), and it explains why this model should never have existed:
http://www.forbes.com/columnists/2006/11/12/cadillac-mercedes-bmw-oped-cz_jf_1114flint.html